BREAKING: CNN Ordered to Pay Millions After Losing Defamation Case Against Navy Veteran

CNN Loses Defamation Case Against Navy Veteran, Ordered to Pay Millions

In a significant victory against alleged media bias, CNN has lost a major defamation case brought by U.S. Navy veteran Zachary Young. Young claimed that CNN’s coverage severely damaged his personal reputation and business through a misleading and defamatory segment.

The controversy stems from CNN’s report on Young’s efforts to assist Afghans fleeing the country following the Taliban’s takeover in 2021. The withdrawal of U.S. forces left many American allies stranded, and Young, through his company, sought to provide evacuation services.

However, in the segment, CNN’s chief national security correspondent Alexander Marquardt portrayed Young’s work in a highly negative light, comparing him to human smugglers and accusing him of charging “exorbitant fees” to desperate Afghans. The segment focused solely on Young’s company, suggesting he was profiting off the suffering of those trying to escape Taliban rule.

Marquardt claimed Young’s company charged $75,000 to transport a vehicle of passengers to Pakistan or $14,500 per person for entry into the United Arab Emirates, labeling the prices as “well beyond the reach of most Afghans.” He further implied wrongdoing, stating that Young “repeatedly declined to break down the cost or say if he’s making money.” The segment also displayed Young’s messages alongside a graphic about “black markets,” implying criminal activity.

The Circuit Court judge, William S. Henry, expressly ruled that Young “did not act illegally or criminally.” Sponsors, not fleeing individuals, paid for Young’s services, and there was no evidence of exploitation or profiteering. Young argued that CNN’s portrayal caused immediate and devastating harm to his reputation and business.

A jury agreed, finding that CNN’s segment falsely characterized Young as an “illegal profiteer” exploiting “desperate Afghans.” Jurors awarded Young $5 million in damages for lost business opportunities and pain and suffering after 8.5 hours of deliberation over two days.

The case is not over yet, as the jury must now determine punitive damages, which could significantly increase the total amount CNN owes.

This verdict is seen as a critical moment for those challenging what they view as unfair practices in mainstream media reporting. Watch the segment in question here: