Senator Adam Schiff (D-CA) has come under fire for a controversial and potentially misleading statement made during an interview on ABC regarding the wildfires in Los Angeles and the role of a non-operational reservoir in the Pacific Palisades. This reservoir, capable of holding 117 million gallons of water, has been cited by critics as a missed opportunity to provide critical resources for firefighting efforts. Many have pointed fingers at California’s government for failing to maintain this key infrastructure.
During the initial stages of the wildfires, reports surfaced indicating that many fire hydrants across Los Angeles were completely depleted of water, severely hampering the efforts of firefighters on the ground. When questioned about this on ABC, Schiff was asked to address the issue directly. The anchor pressed him, saying, “Why did so many of those fire hydrants simply run dry? Was there something to do with that 117 million-gallon reservoir in the Palisades that was out of operation? What’s your understanding? What’s your initial read on this?”
In response, Schiff attempted to downplay the connection between the depleted fire hydrants and the inactive reservoir. “Well, my initial take, and I certainly want a full review of this so that I can form a more complete understanding of the matter,” Schiff began. He then asserted that the reservoirs in question were “full” when the fires started. “But my initial understanding is the reservoirs that the Palisades were drawing on, these 3 million-gallon reservoirs, were full at the initiation of these fires,” he explained.
Schiff went on to argue that even if the reservoir had been operational, it might not have made a significant difference given the scale and intensity of the wildfires. “They’re intended, frankly, to put out homes that house maybe multiple families, not to extinguish an entire town if it’s up in flames,” Schiff stated. “Most particularly, they’re not effective when the winds are so strong that aircraft can’t fly.” He emphasized the difficulty of combating the fires under extreme conditions, noting, “The winds were hurricane-force, reaching up to 100 miles per hour; you can’t fly in that, and you depend on being able to do water drops to extinguish those kinds of flames.”
Critics were quick to challenge Schiff’s remarks, particularly his assertion that the reservoirs were “full” when the fires began. Social media erupted with backlash, with users pointing out inconsistencies in his statements. One prominent conservative account, “I Meme Therefore I Am,” shared a clip of Schiff’s interview, accusing him of misleading the public. “Adam Schiff appeared on national television and misled the American public once again, asserting that the reservoirs ‘were full at the initiation of these fires,’” the post stated.
To bolster their claims, critics highlighted a screenshot from an NBC News article that directly contradicted Schiff’s statements. The article, titled “Reservoir in Pacific Palisades Was Out of Commission When Fires Started,” revealed that the Santa Ynez Reservoir, a 117-million-gallon water storage facility, had been offline for nearly a year due to cover repairs. This key reservoir, located in the heart of the Palisades, had been emptied since February, leaving a critical gap in water supply during the wildfire crisis.
Governor Gavin Newsom has since called for an investigation into the factors contributing to Los Angeles’ water supply issues. The governor’s office released a statement acknowledging the need for accountability and transparency regarding the reservoir’s status and its impact on firefighting efforts. “We must understand what went wrong and ensure that our infrastructure is prepared to support emergency response efforts in the future,” the statement read.
The conservative account “I Meme Therefore I Am” further criticized Schiff’s comments, suggesting that a simple search would have revealed the truth about the reservoir’s operational status. “A simple Google search indicates that there is an ongoing investigation into the reasons behind the Pacific Palisades reservoir being offline,” the account posted. “Furthermore, it reveals that the Santa Ynez Reservoir has been closed since February for cover repairs, leaving it unavailable during this critical time.”
The issue has sparked a broader debate about the state’s preparedness for natural disasters and the maintenance of essential infrastructure. Critics argue that the inactive reservoir highlights systemic failures in California’s government, while others have accused Schiff of deflecting responsibility with his remarks.
As the controversy unfolds, calls for a thorough review of the situation continue to grow. Many are demanding answers about why a vital resource like the Santa Ynez Reservoir was left out of commission for such an extended period. For Californians affected by the devastating wildfires, these questions are not just about accountability but about preventing future tragedies.
Watch the full interview and join the conversation below.
Leave a Reply